The Sweet-Swett-Sweat DNA project now has eleven participants named SWETT. Their lineages are in Table 1. Their test results are in Table 2 and Table 3. Further information is at the bottom of this page.
These are y-chromosome DNA tests, so they only address biological descent in the male line. They measure the lengths of specified markers on the y-chromosome. The measured results are interpreted statistically to show with a stated probability whether any two or more participants have a common male ancestor, and if so, the number of generations back to their most recent common male ancestor.
Table 1 -- LINEAGE OF PARTICIPANTS
(Names of participants are used with their permission)
|
c1590 England |
||||||||||
|
Stephen 1620 England |
Benjamin
1624 England |
|||||||||
|
1648 MA |
1659 MA |
1670 NH |
1673 NH |
|||||||
|
John Jr 1677 MA |
1680 MA |
1688 MA |
1710 NH |
1712 NH |
1711 NH |
1701 MA |
1703 MA |
1705 MA |
||
|
Benjamin 1708 MA |
1713 MA |
1716 MA |
1738 NH |
1739 NH |
1741 NH |
1739 NH |
1742 MA |
1727 MA |
1734 NH |
|
|
Enoch 1740 MA |
1739 CT |
1773 MA |
1763 NH |
1763 ME |
1780 MA |
1768 MA |
1766 MA |
1772 MA |
1765 ME |
1765 NH |
|
Enoch Jr 1764 MA |
1774 ME |
1811 MA |
1805 ME |
1791 ME |
1808 MA |
1814 NH |
1805 NH |
MA |
1810 ME |
1786 ME |
|
Trustum 1791 NH |
1801 MA |
1842 WI |
1836 NH |
1835 IL |
1859 IL |
1857 VT |
1845 NH |
1828 DC |
1852 ME |
1828 ME |
|
Lysander 1827 OH |
1831 Ecuador |
1864 WI |
1888 NH |
1885 NE |
1893 NJ |
1882 CT |
1887 MO |
1855 MS |
1875 ME |
1857 ME |
|
Charles 1851 CA |
1868 Peru |
1934 WI |
1912 NH |
1908 NE |
1925 Latvia |
1909 CT |
1918 CO |
MS |
1910 ME |
1886 ME |
|
Erman 1890 NE |
1903 Ecuador |
|
1948 NH |
1936 CA |
|
1934 CT |
1950 OH |
MI |
1946 ME |
1929 ME |
|
Robert 1928 IA |
1947 Ecuador |
|
|
|
|
|
MI |
1960 MA |
Table 2 -- 25 MARKER DNA TEST RESULTS
(Results for John Swett of Newbury are estimated from
his descendants)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Locus |
9 3 |
9 0 |
9 |
9 1 |
8 5 a |
8 5 b |
2 6 |
8 8 |
3 9 |
8 9 i |
9 2 |
8 9 ii |
5 8 |
5 9 a |
5 9 b |
5 5 |
5 4 |
4 7 |
3 7 |
4 8 |
4 9 |
6 4 a |
6 4 b |
6 4 c |
6 4 d |
||||
of Newbury |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Robert |
13 |
23 |
14 |
10 |
11 |
14 |
12 |
12 |
11 |
13 |
13 |
29 |
18 |
8 |
10 |
11 |
11 |
24 |
15 |
19 |
31 |
14 |
14 |
15 |
17 |
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trevor, Steven, Gary, David and Robert have an exact 25/25 match. Ben, Keith, Francisco, Charles, Raymond and Keith J. match them exactly on 24 of 25 markers -- and they each have a different one-step mismatch. This means it is very likely that the first five men have the DNA profile (haplotype) of John Swett of Newbury himself, and it is very likely that the other six men would match John Swett of Newbury exactly on 24 of 25 markers with 1 one-step mismatch.
24 exact matches with 1 one-step mismatch means:
99.9% probability the participants have a common male ancestor
90% probability their most recent common male ancestor is 20 generations
or less (500 years or less)
95% confidence interval their most recent common male ancestor is 1-28
generations (more than 25 years and less than 700 years)
The participants' lines of descent from John Swett of Newbury (Table
1) show the following generations and years:
Trevor = 10th generation, 335 years
Steven = 11th generation, 344 years
Gary = 11th generation, 346 years
David = 11th generation, 358 years
Robert = 12th generation, 338 years
Ben = 10th generation, 344 years
Keith = 11th generation, 360 years
Francisco = 12th generation, 357 years
Charles = 12th generation, 359 years
Raymond = 11th generation, 356 years
Keith J = 12th generation, 370 years
Taken together, their genealogy and DNA test results prove beyond reasonable doubt that these eleven men and their direct lines of male Swett ancestors are descendants of John Swett of Newbury.
Further, these results provide a DNA profile (haplotype) by which other men who choose to participate in any DNA test that uses the same markers can prove with a high degree of confidence whether they are or are not related to John Swett of Newbury.
Table 3 -- TWO SEPARATE FAMILIES
(Results are estimated from their descendants)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
of Newbury |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
of Salem |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A major finding of the Sweet-Swett-Sweat DNA project is that participating descendants of John SWETT of Newbury and participating descendants of John SWEET of Salem (settled in Rhode Island and Connecticut) do NOT have a common male ancestor in the last 3,000 years. Although SWETT has often been described as a variant of SWEET, these DNA test results prove they are two separate families.
FURTHER INFORMATION
The Sweet-Swett-Sweat DNA project website explains the rationale and plan of action. http://www.fairleafarm.us/dnasweet.htm
Anyone interested in participating should email John Chandler <john.chandler@alum.mit.edu>
and put "Sweet-Swett-Sweat DNA" in the subject line. You can ask him questions
and/or ask him to sign you up for the project. He can explain the project
and DNA testing better than I can, and if you decide to participate, he
will contact the testing agency and make the arrangements. I recommend
the 25 marker test because it is significantly more accurate than the 12
marker test. When the test kit arrives in the mail, it will contain instructions
and an invoice. The discounted price for the 25 marker test was $169 plus
postage when I signed up. I thought it was somewhat expensive, but now
I believe it was a very worthwhile investment. Note: familytreedna.com now offers a 37 marker Y-DNA test for $169 plus postage.